Case Study “Eckernfoerde Bay” – The SubGate Project
We investigated submarine groundwater discharge in the Eckernfoerde Bay, located in the western Baltic Sea (Schlüter et al., 2004).
The Bay has a length of approximately 19 km and a width of 9 km at its mouth. The maximum water depths are 26 to 28 m. In the eastern part of the bay, the basin is divided into two elongated troughs by the Mittelgrund, a moraine remnant, where water depths are less than 10 m (Jensen et al., 2002; Whiticar, 2002).
Pockmarks, elongated depressions approximately 1 to 3 m below adjacent seafloor levels, are located in water depths of 24 to 26 m around the Mittelgrund and along the southern shore.

Eckernförde Bay with a length of approximately 19 km, a width of 9 km at its mouth,and a maximum water depths of 26 to 28 m (Jensen et al., 2002; Whiticar, 2002).
High organic carbon contents of 4% and occurrences of free gas are reported for the muddy sediments (Wever et al., 1998; Whiticar, 2002). In this part of the Baltic Sea, the tides are a few centimeters at the most and changes in water level are generally wind driven.
Sampling and Analysis
During several cruises by research vessels as Littorina, Alkor or Alexander von Humboldt the water column and sediments of the Eckerfoerde Bay were sampled.
By the Rumohr Lot surface sediments were recovered for pore water and sediment analysis. A vibrocorer system (IOW, Warnemünde) was applied to recover sediment cores of up to 6 m length. A temporary well was mounted within the vibro-corer system (Sauter et al., 200*), which allowed sampling of groundwater from the sub-seafloor aquifer.
By shallow seismic investigations (GEUSS, DK) sub-seafloor strata were identified. In combination with sediment analysis this allowed to characterize the sub-seafloor aquifer.
The pore water concentration of Cl –an inert tracer suitable for computation of fluid flow- were analyzed by Mohr–Knudsen titration (Grasshoff et al., 1983). Major elements, such as Na, K, Mg, Ca, were determined by ICP-AES (inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy; Jobin-Yvon JY 170) for several pore water profiles.
A standard headspace technique (Albert et al., 1998) was used to determine methane, which was measured on a Shimatzu gas chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization detector.
222Radon (half-life 3.8 d) and 226Radium (half-life 1,600 yr) were analyzed in water column and sediment samples. 222Rn is the product of 226Ra decay in sediments and seawater.
In seawater 226Ra activity is generally low, whereas considerably higher levels of 226Ra activity are found in the mineral matrix of soils and sediments. Groundwater samples and fluids escaping from the seafloor are therefore enriched in 222Rn as compared to seawater. These natural radio nuclides are applied to trace fluid discharge from the seafloor.
Detailed information concerning the shape and spatial alignment of pockmark locations was obtained during dives with the autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) M600 (A/ S Maridan). The M600 was equipped with a dual channel Klein 2000 side-scan sonar system (100 kHz and 500 kHz), which provides a horizontal resolution of 15 cm, a Geo-Acoustics Chirp for subbottom profiling, an (Sonar Research & Development Ltd. (SRD) seabed visualization system, and a Seabird conductivity, temperature, depth (CTD) recorder.
During eight dives, each lasting as long as 7 h, the M600 operated at 3 or 12 m above seafloor and surveyed regions formerly identified by pore water studies as discharge areas (including pockmarks and nonpockmark regions).
Results
Pockmarks
Pockmark fields in Eckernfoerde Bay were investigated by towed camera systems as well as by shallow seismic survey’s during cruises by research vessels and by dives of the AUV M600 (DeBeers-Maridan / STN Atlas). Video camera observations showed that a fluid sediment–water interface was visible at the center of several of the pockmarks and that this interface appeared to have gentle undulations, suggesting that slow upward percolation was just sufficient to maintain a dense fluid–mud suspension. The sediment echo sounder and side scan sonar tracks surveyed by AUV revealed sediment depth structures and the occurrence of free gas. The side-scan sonar information showed that pockmarks are of nearly circular or elongated shape. The diameter of the circular type was usually 30 m. Pockmark fields of up to 300 m in length were observed by the side-scan sonar survey. High-resolution bathymetric data gathered during AUV dives revealed steep edges with depths increasing by more than 2 m within 8–10 m in lateral directions, equivalent to slopes with an angle of as much as 11°.

A. Pockmark fields in Eckernfoerde Bay. B. Seismic profile across a pockmark of 75-100 length. C. Side-scan sonar images of pockmark fields at water depths of 22 to 26 m. The entire length of these structures is ca. 300 m. D. Bathymetric survey of a pockmark by AUV. The depth profile along the cross section (upper part) is indicated in the lower part. High-resolution bathymetric data gathered during AUV dives revealed steep edges with depths increasing by more than 2 m within 8–10 m in lateral directions, equivalent to slopes with an angle of as much as 11°.
222Radon and 226Radium Data
Water column distributions of 222Rn and 226Ra and pore water analysis were applied to localize and quantify the discharge of fluids from the seafloor by different techniques. In general, an increase in 222Rn activity was observed with water depth. At sites between Mittelgrund and the southern shoreline, 222Rn activities of more than 20 mBq/L were detected in bottom water, suggesting a release of 222Rn through the seepage of fluids. Average 222Rn activities in surface and bottom water are 3.1 and 13.2 mBq/L, respectively.
In contrast to radon, 226Ra activities are nearly invariant with depth. Average 226Ra activities of 2.6 and 3.3 mBq/L were calculated respectively for surface and bottom waters. Comparing samples collected within the bay and the adjacent Kiel Bight shows similar 226Ra activities. Excess 222Rn activity (exceeding in situ production of radon by decay of 226Ra) was prevalent in seawater at virtually all locations. This means that there was a significant source of 222Rn in addition to the activity caused by decay of 226Ra in seawater. The inventory of excess 222Rn was calculated by the integration of water column data. Inventories as great as 200 Bq/m2 and as low as 20 Bq/m2 were observed.

Examples of water column profiles for 222Rn and 226Ra and the location of sampling sites. The inventory of excess 222Rn, calculated by the integration of the water column data, was in the range 20–200 Bq/ m2. The mean excess of 222Rn inventory for the 17 water column profiles was 80 Bq/m2.

Spatial distribution of 222Rn and 226Ra activities in surface water (upper) and bottom water (lower). The diameter of the circles is scaled as shown in the upper left panel.
Most profiles have inventories of 40 to 130 Bq m22. The mean excess 222Rn inventory for the 17 water column profiles was 80 Bq m/2. To consider 222Rn production in sediments, emanation rates of 222Rn have been measured using a slurry stripping technique (Martin and Banta 1992). The emanation rate gives the number of 222Rn atoms available for advective or diffusive transport after escape from sediment particles. At 11 sites 222Rn emanation in sediments was investigated. Minimal and maximal emanation rates of 3.1 to 12 atoms/s kg dry mass, with a mean of 5.2 (62.5), were measured.

Examples of pore water profiles for Cl (left panels) and methane (right panels). The profiles were grouped into three categories. Upper panels: constant concentrations with depth, indicating no affect of freshwater admixture. Middle panels: linearly decreasing profiles with depth, indicating admixture of freshwater by diffusion only. Lower panels: pore water profiles affected by fluid flow, causing a curvature in the pore water profile.
Pore Water
Sediment sampling provided site-specific information concerning fluid discharge and its effect on benthic methane and nutrient cycles. Pore water profiles for Cl provided information about fluid transport in sediments. The measured profiles could be grouped into three categories with respect to shape and asymptotic concentration at depth. Sites unaffected by freshwater were characterized by nearly constant Cl concentrations from the bottom water to sediment depths of more than 40 cm. The second category was characterized by a nearly linear decrease in Cl concentrations with depth. As supported by our pore water modeling, this suggests admixture by freshwater due to molecular diffusion with negligible fluid advection. The third category had low Cl concentrations at depth with profile curvature close to the sediment–water interface indicating active flow of freshwater.
At several sites, the intense admixture of freshwater resulted in Cl concentrations of <30 mmol/L (10% of bottom-water concentration) at sediment depths of 10–20 cm. In addition to chloride concentrations, major ions, such as K, Mg, and Na, were also affected by freshwater admixture.
The Levenberg–Marquardt method was applied to derive an optimal fit of calculated to measured data for modeling Cl pore water profiles to compute fluid flow through the sediment. High flow rates of >5 L/m2 d were observed only at a few sites. The average flow rate was 0.54 L/m2 d. For Cl profiles that had an essentially linear decrease with depth, modeling showed that molecular diffusion was the dominant transport process, whereas fluid advection was negligible.
Methane concentrations were measured in water column and sediment samples. In the water column, CH4 concentrations were generally between 13 and 700 nmol/L. At some sites high concentrations (e.g., up to 1,900 nmol/L CH4) were measured close to the seafloor. This suggests the release of CH4 associated with seepage of fluids from the seafloor.
High CH4 concentrations were observed at several sites in the organic rich sediments of the bay. Pore water
concentrations of methane are often close to CH4 saturation. Free gas was detected in sediments (Wever et al., 1998; Whiticar, 2002), and ebullition of gas bubbles from the seafloor was occasionally observed by our towed video systems. Nevertheless, low CH4 concentration was measured at some sites, although high organic carbon contents were favoring formation of CH4. Flushing of CH4 from sediments by fluid flow was suggested as a mechanism causing low concentrations (Albert et al., 1998; Bussmann et al., 1998; Whiticar, 2002). Even though some of our pore water profiles support this assumption, fluid flow of freshwater from below did not always cause low CH4 concentrations. For example, at pockmark sites, very high as well as low concentrations of Cl and CH4 were observed in close proximity, suggesting strong horizontal and lateral gradients.
Conclusions

Contour plots of Cl concentrations in (A) 40 cm bsf and (B) fluid flow draped on top of the three-dimensional bathymetric map showing the relationship of freshwater admixture to water depth. The spatial distribution of Cl concentrations in panel A indicates the intensive admixture of freshwater for the southern part of the bay and the Mittelgrund area in the center of Eckernfoerde Bay. The spatial distribution in panel B of fluid seepage from the seafloor and flow rates was derived by pore water modeling.
Within the entire bay (~70 km2), pore water modeling suggests a submarine fluid discharge of 4 x 106 to 57 x 106 m3/yr. The budget based on 222Rn inventories of the water column gave an estimate of 37x 106 m3/yr to 337 x 106 m3/y. Although both attempts rely on differing techniques and constraints (e.g., the pore water profiles assumed steady state conditions and the 222Rn estimates ignore molecular diffusion of radon from the seafloor) the budgets were within similar ranges. As a conservative estimate for fluid flow from the seafloor we suggest 4 x 106 to 57x 106 m3/yr, equivalent to 0.3–4.1% of the entire water volume of the bay.
The highest discharge rates were derived for pockmark sites, suggesting a coupling of pockmark formation and fluid flow. One mechanism for the formation of circular depressions in lake and river deposits is the fluidization of sediments caused by fluid flow from below, forming ‘‘sand boils’’ (Guhman and Pederson, 1992). For muddy sediments in Eckernfoerde Bay, the interaction of fluid flow and bottom currents is suggested to be a mechanism for the formation and preservation of pockmarks. Fluid flow through sediments decreases the shear strength of the sediment matrix, and periodic strong bottom currents, including episodic storm surges, cause preferential erosion of these areas when compared to adjacent seafloor, which in turn preserves sharp edges and the considerable slope within the pockmarks observed by AUV and towed video systems.
Fluid flow was also obvious for sites at which no distinct morphological features were observed at the seafloor. The considerable small-scale variability of Cl and CH4 at pockmarks suggests an intensive interaction of transport processes with methane production and consumption kinetics. Changes in the forcing factors of fluid flow such as hydraulic head (here, e.g., the water level height in Eckernfoerde Bay) cause lower/higher flow velocities and different flow paths. This permits diffusion of methane from sites of higher content to regions formerly depleted due to fluid flow, underlining the need for improved sampling techniques to record small-scale variation at discharge sites.
Ecological aspects associated with fluid discharge, although not at the center of this study, seem to be likely. The large area affected by freshwater (~22% of the entire bay) might affect benthic habitats, and nutrient release from sediments to the water column will be enhanced due to advective transport. The geological setting of glacial coastal sediments covered by organic rich mud deposits observed for Eckernfoerde Bay may be representative for other coastal zones of the Baltic Sea where submarine groundwater discharge from subseafloor aquifers could be of similar relevance.
Partner of the EC Project SubGate (1998-2001)
Find more general information about Submariine Groundwater Discharge.







